<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for GSM operators plan mobile IM standard</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/13/gsm-operators-plan-mobile-im-standard/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for GSM operators plan mobile IM standard</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GSM operators plan mobile IM standard]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/13/gsm-operators-plan-mobile-im-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/13/gsm-operators-plan-mobile-im-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh come ON now.<br><br>The mobile industry already HAS a push for mobile IM and presence, IMPS / WV!<br><br>It even has the heavy hitters SE and Nokia rocking it.<br><br>Why they just didn't do it with Jabber is beyond me.  Though it goes without saying that Orange (a France Telecom company) was hedging on Jabber/XMPP for mobile presence and messaging but never delivered anything worth using.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2006 1:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>