http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/ Engadget Mobile Comments for WinMo team member explains why Microsoft went with 240 x 240 http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/Feb 17th 2006 7:34AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/Feb 17th 2006 9:50AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/Feb 17th 2006 2:38PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/Consumers don't give a sh*t about satisfying producers' product line lifecycle goals; they want to see products IMPROVE.
(you hear that, Palm?)]]>Feb 18th 2006 9:27AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/02/17/winmo-team-member-explains-why-microsoft-went-with-240-x-240/Feb 19th 2006 3:52AM