How does Engadget explain that after running countless anti-NTP stories they run a story on a rather eye-opening piece regarding NTP, one that seems to shirk the "opportunistic assholes" image NTP has, saying in their very own post that it is eye opening and almost makes you want to root for NTP (a sentiment I share after having read some of the things coming from both sides, not the least of which being a few arrogant and choice remarks made by the RIM founder), and then follow it up a day or two later with another post blasting NTP and continuing that tradition right on up till today.
And NOW you are even insinuating that the judge is, for all intents and purposes, corrupt, and just using this incident to milk the spotlight.
Pretty bold claim from a bunch of blog writers who can't even keep their own site consistent.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I've said it before and I will say it again.
How does Engadget explain that after running countless anti-NTP stories they run a story on a rather eye-opening piece regarding NTP, one that seems to shirk the "opportunistic assholes" image NTP has, saying in their very own post that it is eye opening and almost makes you want to root for NTP (a sentiment I share after having read some of the things coming from both sides, not the least of which being a few arrogant and choice remarks made by the RIM founder), and then follow it up a day or two later with another post blasting NTP and continuing that tradition right on up till today.
And NOW you are even insinuating that the judge is, for all intents and purposes, corrupt, and just using this incident to milk the spotlight.
Pretty bold claim from a bunch of blog writers who can't even keep their own site consistent.
Get any checks from RIM lately?