<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im interested but:<br>-Its a free service<br>-I can connect to a bigger display (tv, monitor)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oscar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  I don't want to have to pay an extra $25 a month to have it.   I mean, it'd be cool when your in the waiting room or something but, really, I'm paying $75 a month of TV at home and I'd rather watch the HD TV at home.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</guid><description><![CDATA[not sure why anyone even cares about this study or that study or really takes any of it seriously.  The first thing anyone should learn about statistics is that you can make the data say anything you want it to.  The only true measure if anyone is really interested in mobile tv is if people actually buy and use the devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[liquid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Consumers are/aren&#039;t hot for mobile TV, Part III]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/03/09/consumers-are-arent-hot-for-mobile-tv-part-iii/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's cool...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[World]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 5th 2006 6:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>