<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</guid><description><![CDATA[Crossbow isn't Windows Mobile 6.0<br><br>If you check the PowerPoint that I provided the link for, which is linked in your previous article on Crossbow/Photon, you will see on slide 55 that Windows Mobile 5.0 & Photon are both listed as "Platform RTM", while Crossbow is clearly listed as an "Add-On RTM". Obviously, a new Windows Mobile version release wouldn't be called an "Add-On". <br><br>I think it’s far more likely that Crossbow is going to be "Windows Mobile 5.0 Second Edition (SE)"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uni]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 28th 2006 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</guid><description><![CDATA[marketing teams....<br>they'll call it whatever they want<br><br><br>AS LONG AS IT WILL SELL :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[afhstingray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2006 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</guid><description><![CDATA[Any word as to weather it will take advantage of the modular component install that was supposed to be included with WM5, or will we have to wait for OEM's to test and release it (ie maybe never for many OEM's)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 2nd 2006 3:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Crossbow to be Windows Mobile 6.0?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/04/28/crossbow-to-be-windows-mobile-6-0/</guid><description><![CDATA[To bad MS couldn't add to some of the abismal functioning in mobile 5.0:<br>1) Excel/Word apps incompatible with desktop version.<br>2) No file syncing with actual desktop files.<br>3) Crappy browser.<br>4) Terminal Services Client hobbled by inability to blank out wallpaper of host pc.<br>5) No remote syncing with desktop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[handy_guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 9:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>