Hmm... this all seems to be working very well for Apple. First, Cisco takes them to court over the "iPhone" name. Next, "Visual Voicemail"... Each time they have to go to court, there's an injunction so they can't sell the product in question. Each injunction means further delays concerning getting that thing to market. Each delay means more time for Apple to actually start building the thing. After all the cases are resolved, if Apple comes out the winner, they can counter-sue for lost profits because they couldn't sell the product. I know this is very fuzzy logic, but is it just me, or is there a grand scheme here?
“Apart from the fact that it's got a bit of infamy to outgrow, the old model was a pretty sharp-looking handset and the Storm2 refines that look in all the right ways.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Hmm... this all seems to be working very well for Apple.
First, Cisco takes them to court over the "iPhone" name.
Next, "Visual Voicemail"...
Each time they have to go to court, there's an injunction so they can't sell the product in question.
Each injunction means further delays concerning getting that thing to market.
Each delay means more time for Apple to actually start building the thing.
After all the cases are resolved, if Apple comes out the winner, they can counter-sue for lost profits because they couldn't sell the product.
I know this is very fuzzy logic, but is it just me, or is there a grand scheme here?