http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Fido and Rogers raising cancellation fee? http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/
Bell Mobility has also had their cancellation fees at 400$ for a few years now.

Top all that off with absolutely no unlimited data packages from any provider, and you realize that it truly does suck to be a mobile user in Canada. ]]>Feb 6th 2007 6:16PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/
As posted by Dhomas Rogers' (& Fido's) cancellation fee is still equal to or lower than all of the competition.

So since Rogers still has the lowest cancellation fee I don't see this hurting them at all.]]>Feb 6th 2007 9:12PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/
They list the "no contract" price of the SE810i as $359, which makes the $149 2 year contract look like a deal. But what if Rogers buys the SE810i for $120/1,000?

Then the deal is junk. You're offering $1000 to Rogers and they're offering an imaginary discount on a year+ old handset.

Contracts should offer something REAL to both parties.]]>Feb 7th 2007 11:28AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/fido-and-rogers-raising-cancellation-fee/Feb 13th 2007 11:27AM