<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[The battery in that phone is either going to be so small it's pathetic (if it covers the SIM) or hueg liek Xbox (if it goes where the model # is shown).<br><br>I actually hope it's the latter and it's somewhat efficient - more battery life on 3g phones is a good thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looking at the batter contacts i am going to say it will be a pretty large battery that will fit over the ID label. That is not to say its not just an incredibly large incredibly weak battery however. That would be about on par for pantech.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh... Blah!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tnkgrl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey Pantech, Samsung just called, they said they want their design back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[^^^Hahahaha "they want their design back" haha...so true...  Anyways...what's the deal with "sadly it's a clamshell"  I happen to think clamshells are the best so why don't you stfu.  Candybars are horrible (generally speaking)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thanks, FCC: Pantech's 3G C600 for Cingular]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/06/thanks-fcc-pantechs-3g-c600-for-cingular/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is so plain, boring, and definately ripped off from samsungs designs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 5:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>