<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[Blackberry vs. Windows Mobile? Don't make me laugh.<br><br>Y really tried hard to fall in love with WM's vast availability of 3rd party software, used both the Treo 750 and GTC TTyN - really uptodate devices.<br><br>But after half a dozen of daily reboots and a system crash produced by an incoming call (unrecoverable...) I promised not to touch again any Bill Gates stuff on a mission critical environment such as a phone.<br><br>This made me find out why Blackberry and Nokia (Symbian) smartphones do not have that infamous hole where you find the WM devices' reset button. THEY DON'T NEED IT!! They never really crash or at least not as bad as not being able to solve it by turning off/on the phone.<br><br>NO BILL GATES STUFF ON MY PHONE, please]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerhard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2007 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Q with the lastest software that is stable and the battery now lasts me almost 2 days (still crap, but alot better than before).<br><br>Please stop with the OMG Windows products crash daily!!! bs ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OGHowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2007 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG THANKS RIM FOR CLEARING THIS UP...ALL THIS TIME I THOUGHT THE BLACKJACK WAS THE NEW BLACKBERRY UNTIL I READ THIS STORY!1111]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T-Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2007 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on RIM and Samsung make nice on naming dispute]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/08/rim-and-samsung-make-nice-on-naming-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't laugh, my boss almost bought one until I told him that it wasn't a BlackBerry.  I'm like, "No, it runs WinMo," and he's like, "Get out, a BlackBerry that runs WinMo?"<br><br>Scared the livin' crap out of me....that he's my boss, that is...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 9th 2007 2:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>