I might as well say it. This phone is still 3 years behind. Maybe 2. It lacks EDGE as well, I believe. Whats the point of something like this, with its enphasis on being able to do great things, if the data technology isnt there to back it up.
The first Neonode LACKED GPRS. This one HAS IT, and thats what makes it ridiculous, since its the only data connection available. Make it a little bigger and add WiFi at least. TO much trouble giving it EDGE? This is a 100% non-competitor.
No, the IPhone and HTC is 3 years behind since they came with the touch NOW! Oh sure, they got a bit more technical stuff but they're bigger and not that as good looking as the Neonode N2 is. TRY the phone out before you state your mind. Because I'm very happy with my little N2.
“There's a certain feeling of wading through water with this phone, as every time we went exploring the menus, we were met with a delay long enough to make us doubt our keystrokes registered.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I might as well say it. This phone is still 3 years behind. Maybe 2. It lacks EDGE as well, I believe. Whats the point of something like this, with its enphasis on being able to do great things, if the data technology isnt there to back it up.
The first Neonode LACKED GPRS. This one HAS IT, and thats what makes it ridiculous, since its the only data connection available. Make it a little bigger and add WiFi at least. TO much trouble giving it EDGE? This is a 100% non-competitor.
No, the IPhone and HTC is 3 years behind since they came with the touch NOW! Oh sure, they got a bit more technical stuff but they're bigger and not that as good looking as the Neonode N2 is. TRY the phone out before you state your mind. Because I'm very happy with my little N2.