<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for ACCESS ALP hits 1.0, new specs released</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/15/access-alp-hits-1-0-new-specs-released/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for ACCESS ALP hits 1.0, new specs released</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ACCESS ALP hits 1.0, new specs released]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/15/access-alp-hits-1-0-new-specs-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/15/access-alp-hits-1-0-new-specs-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[My guess is the lack of a 320 x 320 resolution is probably a polite way of letting existing Treo owners know that they will not be flashing your phone to use ALP. Bummer.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2007 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ACCESS ALP hits 1.0, new specs released]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/15/access-alp-hits-1-0-new-specs-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/02/15/access-alp-hits-1-0-new-specs-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure that Access would have released an announcement if the software was at version 1.0. What would be the point of not doing so?<br><br>If they support all those other resolutions, why wouldn't it just scale to 320 x 320?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alan westbrook]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2007 4:54PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>