http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/ Engadget Mobile Comments for The 'iPhone nano' patent surfaces http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 6th 2007 7:07AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/
A smaller iPhone model was inevitable anyway. But, personally, Apple can come up with something more creative than this. It's like they're taking a step backward by shrinking down the screen.

The rotary dial-thingy should be interesting though!]]>Jul 6th 2007 9:34AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 6th 2007 10:38AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 7th 2007 1:16PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/
C'mon an iphone nano whould never look like this.
I was expecting something looking much more like a conventional phone...

Like being slightly smaller then the origanl and having a keypad instad of the large multi-touch screen, but the overall design like the silver freame and black plastice coved in glass.

anybody feeling my rift?]]>Jul 6th 2007 10:41AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 6th 2007 12:22PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/
http://iphone.corank.com]]>Jul 6th 2007 10:47AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 6th 2007 11:01AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/Jul 6th 2007 2:46PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/
How long will it take to dial a number?
]]>Jul 6th 2007 2:51PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/touch interface on the back (bottom) and the display on the top
(front). For those who don't feel like taking the 3-click-trip, here
are the relevant
links:http://www.unwiredview.com/2007/05/10/next-gen-ipod-and-iphone-nano-full-screen-with-touchpanel-at-the-bottom/http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070103454%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070103454&RS=DN/20070103454I
believe that was posted here or on engadgetmobile back when it was
filed in May

(For anyone who saw this comment on Engadget, sorry for the double-post. I initially meant to just post it here because this image is more misleading than the one there.)]]>Jul 9th 2007 9:33PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/004855.html it even has a picture fir the iphone shuffle LOL]]>Dec 5th 2007 5:09PM