<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your going to have to update your iPhone Nano photo with only the Phone and iPod icons... :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the point of an overpriced iPhone without web features when the most basic of phones have Internet nowadays?<br><br>Also I'm guessing that AT&T won't be too happy with not having data on the device - they're loving the guaranteed extra $20 a month right now.<br><br>I'm sure the iPhone nano will have Web, maybe not Mail, but surely it'll have Web.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, let's poll people about how happy they are with their iPhone after the less expensive version comes out and again when the 2nd gen arrives, less than a year after the original debuted.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Some truth behind persistent iPhone "nano" rumors?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/07/19/some-truth-behind-persistent-iphone-nano-rumors/</guid><description><![CDATA[WoW if it only has "Music" and phone then no one would buy it because every basic phone has email, Web (scaled but ok), and SMS. Maybe the phone should be called Isuck or IdonthavethebeasicfeatureofaphonebutihaveanIinfrontofmephone  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 8:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>