Imagine if this goes to higher court and they order Apple to stop the sales of the i-phone, and/or force Apple to pay them like how RIM had to pay NTP.
I imagine this won't go anyway. Even if that circus of a court agrees with the idea that the patent was legitimate to begin with, Apple can just appeal (and appeal they will)
Also, you're also going to have ATT's laywers on Apple's side too, and I think the Jobs-man has more than enough attorneys at his side to make this not even worth his while.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Imagine if this goes to higher court and they order Apple to stop the sales of the i-phone, and/or force Apple to pay them like how RIM had to pay NTP.
I imagine this won't go anyway. Even if that circus of a court agrees with the idea that the patent was legitimate to begin with, Apple can just appeal (and appeal they will)
Also, you're also going to have ATT's laywers on Apple's side too, and I think the Jobs-man has more than enough attorneys at his side to make this not even worth his while.