Personally, I don't think Engadget is being biased in this case, they are simply pointing out the facts. The battery really is described as going through 300 cycles before its life begins to deteriorate. Its the same with almost any battery-powered electronic device.
I don't think Engadget is covering anyone's rear, but more incensed with the amount of law suits being filed over an issue, which is known before people purchased their batteries. The key issue for this case is "if there is a class-action lawsuit, which law firm gets to be lead". There is huge money there and everyone wants free money for being 'ignorant'.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I like how Engadget Tries to Cover Apples ASs. Talk about favoring a company. what ever happen to being non bias
Personally, I don't think Engadget is being biased in this case, they are simply pointing out the facts. The battery really is described as going through 300 cycles before its life begins to deteriorate. Its the same with almost any battery-powered electronic device.
The only difference is the cost of replacement =/
I don't think Engadget is covering anyone's rear, but more incensed with the amount of law suits being filed over an issue, which is known before people purchased their batteries. The key issue for this case is "if there is a class-action lawsuit, which law firm gets to be lead". There is huge money there and everyone wants free money for being 'ignorant'.