elgee02, your "Verizon can do no evil" stance has gotten so absurd you're spewing nonsense.
Verizon wants the spectrum limited to one single company. That said company would control what flows on the network. There would be no CHOICE. There would only be one company. That is the point of the open-access. Having more than one choice, means different companies would have to compete for customers. This means competition. If there was only one company Verizon could charge whatever it wanted for the service. But I think you knew this already and needed to put your Verizon defense regardless if it made sense or not.
“We're grateful that RIM has finally decided to pay some attention to the sizable number of non-PC users that have been stuck with poor alternatives for way too long.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
elgee02, your "Verizon can do no evil" stance has gotten so absurd you're spewing nonsense.
Verizon wants the spectrum limited to one single company. That said company would control what flows on the network. There would be no CHOICE. There would only be one company. That is the point of the open-access. Having more than one choice, means different companies would have to compete for customers. This means competition. If there was only one company Verizon could charge whatever it wanted for the service. But I think you knew this already and needed to put your Verizon defense regardless if it made sense or not.