I'll never understand the gratification some people get by commenting on stories as if they were the end-all, know-all authority on all the issues involved, then talking down (at length) to others who think otherwise. It's mind-boggling.
I would guess this move is due to pressure from AT&T. A lot of people in the US have been turned off by the exclusive service commitment, hence the demand for unlocked phones (I'd love an iPhone, but I think the price and quality of T-mobile's service far outweigh the need to keep up with the iJoneses). It seems like Apple would make more money with a lax unlocking policy, as opening up the iPhone to multiple carriers would drastically increase its potential market. The only company who wins here is AT&T.
Seriously though, is anyone doubting that a post-update version of the hack is going to be released in record time?
Well AT&T and apple care. Apple is not only fleecing its consumers (especially early adapters) for full pop pricing with no subsidization on 2 year contracts, they are also getting a nice chunk of the AT&T contracts. 10% to 20% I would guess?? These deals are obviously more lucrative then actual hardware sales or they would have just released the handsets and sold way more of them unlocked. One could have wondered if they may have done just as well selling it to the carriers and making them overpay for it and let them subsidize it.
“Microsoft's not promising the world with Windows Mobile 6.5, nor are they delivering it -- it's very much a stopgap, complete with duct tape, bubble gum, and Bondo.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I'll never understand the gratification some people get by commenting on stories as if they were the end-all, know-all authority on all the issues involved, then talking down (at length) to others who think otherwise. It's mind-boggling.
I would guess this move is due to pressure from AT&T. A lot of people in the US have been turned off by the exclusive service commitment, hence the demand for unlocked phones (I'd love an iPhone, but I think the price and quality of T-mobile's service far outweigh the need to keep up with the iJoneses). It seems like Apple would make more money with a lax unlocking policy, as opening up the iPhone to multiple carriers would drastically increase its potential market. The only company who wins here is AT&T.
Seriously though, is anyone doubting that a post-update version of the hack is going to be released in record time?
Well AT&T and apple care. Apple is not only fleecing its consumers (especially early adapters) for full pop pricing with no subsidization on 2 year contracts, they are also getting a nice chunk of the AT&T contracts. 10% to 20% I would guess?? These deals are obviously more lucrative then actual hardware sales or they would have just released the handsets and sold way more of them unlocked. One could have wondered if they may have done just as well selling it to the carriers and making them overpay for it and let them subsidize it.