<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[So... does anyone else think this looks like the e715 from t-mobile back in let's say, 2004? Actually, no, this is the e715 it even has the same specs.<br><br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-E715-Phone-T-Mobile/dp/B0000E3GWH" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-E715-Phone-T-Mobile/dp/B0000E3GWH</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes, except the lack of LED flash]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ceity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is a prepaid phone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[No edge? but how it will compete with the iPhone?!<br><br>j/k]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[it won't compete... it already won!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yubastard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows AT&amp;T's lowly SGH-a127]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/10/09/samsung-shows-atandts-lowly-sgh-a127/</guid><description><![CDATA[We've had these as prepaid at the walmart I work at for  a couple weeks. It's actually selling pretty well, elderly people seem to love it, it has a very "classic" look.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick2.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 1:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>