I don't see why after all Apple does not respect registered trade marks and if you don't agree they just launch the product and let you fight it out (Linksys iPhone). Sure Linksys did not use the name as well as they could have but lets not forget it was REGISTERED. Apple couldn't force Cisco to do what they wanted plus Cisco has a far larger market cap, more cash in the bank and they have some very tough lawyers. End result the might Steve-O is not that mighty.
On a side note why bother with iPhone 1.0 Steve-O stated in London iPhone 2.0 is due out next year so just wait and get the better product. I don't own an iPhone and I do suggest others not buy it and look for a device that is unlocked, user customizable with the apps you want when you want and full featured.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I don't see why after all Apple does not respect registered trade marks and if you don't agree they just launch the product and let you fight it out (Linksys iPhone). Sure Linksys did not use the name as well as they could have but lets not forget it was REGISTERED. Apple couldn't force Cisco to do what they wanted plus Cisco has a far larger market cap, more cash in the bank and they have some very tough lawyers. End result the might Steve-O is not that mighty.
On a side note why bother with iPhone 1.0 Steve-O stated in London iPhone 2.0 is due out next year so just wait and get the better product. I don't own an iPhone and I do suggest others not buy it and look for a device that is unlocked, user customizable with the apps you want when you want and full featured.