<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whatever happened to the computer, the Nanobook? Is this still a computer that Apple is planning on putting out?<br><br>I hear the word Nanobook being thrown around an awful lot but it's usually in relationship to phones and mp3 players and never a laptop or a brand. I'd really like the laptop version!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trigatch4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still holding out for the iPhone shuffle. You know, the one with no screen that randomly picks up and makes calls, but still priced at $75 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><description><![CDATA[Be careful what you say Dan, Apple might be ready to steal your idea. But that won't be until the iPhone Video Phone with a built-in webcam!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William Hartmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 11:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's real, I just saw the pic in this post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 9:41PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
