http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Danger files for $100M IPO http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/Dec 26th 2007 4:25PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/
"I haven't seen a sidekick lx commercial since its release and that is just horrible advertising period"

I'm not a marketing expert, but I am sure some, if not most of that falls on T-Mobile, not Danger but I could be wrong.]]>Dec 20th 2007 5:54PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/
Danger's #1 problem is that they have one and only one product, and that product is only popular with a few certain crowds (hearing impaired & teens). If they expanded their device portfolio and released on a 3G network, whether HSPDA or EVDO, they would start making a lot more money.]]>Dec 20th 2007 7:37PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/
Not to mention the device is marketed towards kids, or those who have had it for years now.

If they stopped with the bubblegum skins and put in some real funcitonality, maybe WiFi or UMA, maybe they would get the interest of some real users.]]>Dec 20th 2007 6:22PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/12/20/danger-files-for-100m-ipo/Dec 29th 2007 2:10AM