<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Nokia's 1209 and 2600 classic, simple and super cheap</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/01/22/nokias-1209-and-2600-classic-simple-and-super-cheap/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Nokia's 1209 and 2600 classic, simple and super cheap</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia's 1209 and 2600 classic, simple and super cheap]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/01/22/nokias-1209-and-2600-classic-simple-and-super-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/01/22/nokias-1209-and-2600-classic-simple-and-super-cheap/</guid><description><![CDATA[hehe. know why they had to tag that word "classic" onto the 2600? ironically, because there's already a 2600. I used to own one. Nokia made it exclusively for Tracfone.<br>Anyway, I sure hope this new 2600 has a better screen than my old 2600... because not only was its response time like molasses, it was murder trying to see ANYTHING on that screen in any sort of sunlight. It was like a throwback to the EARLY days of LCDs. 4096 colors, anyone?<br>But I could say one thing good about that phone - its OS was at least as responsive as anyone might expect. The new Motorola W370 KRZR-look-alike that I have now is SO underpowered in the CPU department. I would think a bigger, better screen would necessitate a processor that can keep up as well.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2008 3:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>