hehe. know why they had to tag that word "classic" onto the 2600? ironically, because there's already a 2600. I used to own one. Nokia made it exclusively for Tracfone. Anyway, I sure hope this new 2600 has a better screen than my old 2600... because not only was its response time like molasses, it was murder trying to see ANYTHING on that screen in any sort of sunlight. It was like a throwback to the EARLY days of LCDs. 4096 colors, anyone? But I could say one thing good about that phone - its OS was at least as responsive as anyone might expect. The new Motorola W370 KRZR-look-alike that I have now is SO underpowered in the CPU department. I would think a bigger, better screen would necessitate a processor that can keep up as well.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
hehe. know why they had to tag that word "classic" onto the 2600? ironically, because there's already a 2600. I used to own one. Nokia made it exclusively for Tracfone.
Anyway, I sure hope this new 2600 has a better screen than my old 2600... because not only was its response time like molasses, it was murder trying to see ANYTHING on that screen in any sort of sunlight. It was like a throwback to the EARLY days of LCDs. 4096 colors, anyone?
But I could say one thing good about that phone - its OS was at least as responsive as anyone might expect. The new Motorola W370 KRZR-look-alike that I have now is SO underpowered in the CPU department. I would think a bigger, better screen would necessitate a processor that can keep up as well.