I believe the spectrum is not really well suited to Internet services because of the technical characteristics of the low freqency signal. I think it is fine for voice in the portfolio of an incumbent carrier, but as a stand alone internet service, 700mhz is ill suited.
Yes philip. I agree. Anything one way would be fine. Thats why its so funny that everyone is calling this "beachfront property" for some new nationwide internet service. BULL!
The reason is density. Its not that 850mhz or 700mhz can't work at all. It just a question of how many people in a given area are expected to be serviced. In fact, here in the US we use 850mhz too, but mainly in rural areas. We just don't use it in highly populated areas, at least as a primary. In a highly populated area it is paired with 1900mhz. I don't know much about the population centers or penetration in Australia, but its all about how much usage is expected in a given physical area.
Have a read. I still see the 700mhz as possibly viable for it. I mean, if Telstra can do it (and they're one of the worst telcos in Aus!), then why couldn't Google? :P
“There's a certain feeling of wading through water with this phone, as every time we went exploring the menus, we were met with a delay long enough to make us doubt our keystrokes registered.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
as I blogged about today at
http://whydoeseverythingsuck.com/2008/01/700mhz-spectrum-not-so-great-for.html
I believe the spectrum is not really well suited to Internet services because of the technical characteristics of the low freqency signal. I think it is fine for voice in the portfolio of an incumbent carrier, but as a stand alone internet service, 700mhz is ill suited.
Like TV now, the 700MHz won't be used for two-way communication. At least not for home usage.
It would be a one-way, into the home, data pipe. Things that wouldn't require a ton of bandwidth, and don't require acknowledgment.
Things like:
Weather information
School closings
Local news (text, simple pictures)
Emergency Information
etc.
That is what I think it will be used for.
Yes philip. I agree. Anything one way would be fine. Thats why its so funny that everyone is calling this "beachfront property" for some new nationwide internet service. BULL!
Also, what Google might do is use this to connect all the dark fiber that they bought waaay back when the .com bubble burst.
Just a thought. They have so much technology that they need to connect.
I don't know how true that is...
Telstra's NextG network here in Australia operates on the 850mhz band. It gives you super-fast 3G internet. Why couldn't the 700mhz band?
Josh,
The reason is density. Its not that 850mhz or 700mhz can't work at all. It just a question of how many people in a given area are expected to be serviced. In fact, here in the US we use 850mhz too, but mainly in rural areas. We just don't use it in highly populated areas, at least as a primary. In a highly populated area it is paired with 1900mhz. I don't know much about the population centers or penetration in Australia, but its all about how much usage is expected in a given physical area.
Hank,
Thanks for your reply. :)
NextG is used in all rural areas of Australia. Our population density out in the sticks varies between slim and none ;)
They still get fast internet there through the NextG network (although Telstra rort you for the priviledge).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NextG#Telstra_Mobile
Have a read. I still see the 700mhz as possibly viable for it. I mean, if Telstra can do it (and they're one of the worst telcos in Aus!), then why couldn't Google? :P