Given that Metro's focus is on population centers, and that the people in those rural areas (traveling or living there) are significantly less numerous, I'm willing to bet that the number is significantly less than 90%.
Esp. once Metro finishes deploying in NYC (currently in the works).
And, either way, they have to compete with Metro's prices when they are in those zones. And in the rural areas, they have to compete with Cricket.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Given that Metro's focus is on population centers, and that the people in those rural areas (traveling or living there) are significantly less numerous, I'm willing to bet that the number is significantly less than 90%.
Esp. once Metro finishes deploying in NYC (currently in the works).
And, either way, they have to compete with Metro's prices when they are in those zones. And in the rural areas, they have to compete with Cricket.