<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is just US users.  I wonder how different things would look in a worldwide survey.  I'm also curious as to why they only mention Verizon and AT&T without discussing Sprint and T-Mobile.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Omagus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[why is HTC not on this list at all?  they make a ton of phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anervoustwitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also find it strikingly odd that HTC was left out of the survey. Especially considering that behind Nokia, they probably represent the largest number of phones on the market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beretta1526]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll third this.  I think that makes this a useless survey.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khidr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because HTC only has 2 self branded devices in the US (Touch & Mogul) and no brand recognition...but I guess they could have said "Are you happy with your Tilt, Touch, Mogul, Wing, etc.".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fyreblazer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[How the heck did LG beat out Nokia and Samsung?   <br><br>LG makes some of the most unreliable handsets on the market.   <br><br>Even the motorolas perform better than the LGS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIKE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[LGs on CDMA, very reliable.. LGs on GSM, not so much]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[Matt is right. LG CDMA phones are very solid (for the most part), but not so much for LG's GSM phones. It does look like they are getting better there as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm ranks last in satisfaction survey, no one surprised]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/13/palm-ranks-last-in-satisfaction-survey-no-one-surprised/</guid><description><![CDATA[i disagree 100%. i LOVE my LG cu500 and cu575 phones.<br><br>now i do LOVE my Nokias even more! but my two LGs are excellent phones. (both gsm)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2008 12:41PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>