<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzxJy-7ggx0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzxJy-7ggx0</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robotrock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2008 10:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the reader can see all those dots in the smaller of the two codes, why shouldn't they just make a NEW kind of QR code with more dots of that size and store WAY more info than one small code and one large code of the same bit-dimensions? I imagine they'd have to make new readers for this double QR code anyway, so i really don't see the point...<br>Now, if a reader that could only see the large dots could still process THAT information without getting confused, and still glean something useful from the code (just not ALL the data present), it KIND OF makes sense, but even then that's stretching it...<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2008 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</guid><description><![CDATA[RUSH TO THE PATENT OFFICE EVERYONE!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[athousandleaves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2008 2:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</guid><description><![CDATA[Something funny that I came across the other day was a Sprint magazine ad that boasted how they have this revolutionary new phone technology called "bar codes!" Wow.<br><br>Everytime I think that our mobile phone industry is starting to catch up to Asia, something else comes along to make me realize that we're still a few years behind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MinceyFresh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2008 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Firm proposes "double QR code" -- we say, why stop there?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/02/19/firm-proposes-double-qr-code-we-say-why-stop-there/</guid><description><![CDATA["7 minute abs"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuengling440]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2008 8:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>