Always made me wonder why they don't just link the article to the Mobile website to increase traffic over there. Everyone visits Engadget, but most people don't bother with the sub-channels. By linking to that site, they'll probably bring more people over and get higher traffic on both.
Yeah, I never understood why they didn't make the stories share comments. The main site always gets more discussion, and I would just read the cellphone category there if Mobile didn't get more stories.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
the free low-quality channels are always included. You need an actual subscription to get CD-quality and more premium channels.
Also, why is this article both on Engadget and Engadget Mobile. Kind of makes "Mobile" obsolete if it's going to be in both places.
--James
About half the Engadget Mobile articles are also on Engadget. It's always been like that.
Always made me wonder why they don't just link the article to the Mobile website to increase traffic over there. Everyone visits Engadget, but most people don't bother with the sub-channels. By linking to that site, they'll probably bring more people over and get higher traffic on both.
Yeah, I never understood why they didn't make the stories share comments. The main site always gets more discussion, and I would just read the cellphone category there if Mobile didn't get more stories.
@ Darkest Daze - they do. the "read" link goes to the full Mobile article.