This is ridiculous. I'm on board with the idea of "visual pollution," but I think it applies more so to advertising than this. The only distinction is that no one is pocketing any change as a result of this kind of "visual pollution." It's only purpose is the empowerment of individual expression and, let's be honest, who cares about that anymore?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This is ridiculous. I'm on board with the idea of "visual pollution," but I think it applies more so to advertising than this. The only distinction is that no one is pocketing any change as a result of this kind of "visual pollution." It's only purpose is the empowerment of individual expression and, let's be honest, who cares about that anymore?