<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</guid><description><![CDATA[WTF!!!  Seriously.  I love TMO, but this love affair with Samsung is killing me!  Bring on the high end SE phones!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brux2dc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2008 10:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed! at&t shouldn't get all the sony ericsson glory. come on!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2008 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like their colours.<br><a href="http://www.madeinchina.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.madeinchina.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amymou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2008 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</guid><description><![CDATA[You don't want a SE phone, they lock up and fail just like anything made by sony since the mid 1990's.... SE is the reason that Cingular drops calls so bad.. all their towers are SE.... T-Mobiles are Lucent... and we have the fewest dropped calls.... Samsung phones are absolutely awesome, the worst phones in the world are as follows: Motorola, Kyocera, Sony, Sanyo....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tristate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2008 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's latest pair of cheap Samsungs: meet the T229 and T339]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/03/25/t-mobiles-latest-pair-of-cheap-samsungs-meet-the-t229-and-t339/</guid><description><![CDATA[SE's phones are in no way related to the towers.<br><br>I'm not saying that the towers aren't by SE, I'm just saying that don't trash their handsets because of their towers(I'm not even sure if they make ALL the towers).<br><br>SE's handsets are great. Having owned over 10, they're more reliable than a handset from any other manufacturer. Nokia's have failed and Motorola's are just crap.<br><br>The worst problem I've had with an SE is for it to freeze and require a restart.<br><br>The only phone that has actually worked consistently well that wasn't made by SE, were the 5 Samsung's I've owned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[turtledude558]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 23rd 2008 9:38AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>