<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least Sprint is licensing Visual Voicemail the LEGAL way..ahem..yah!<br><br>--James]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, instead of using there marketing team to come up with there own idea of a cool phone for sprint, they just copy a idea thats already been done...lol wow... i remember when the razr phone came out and samsung....YES samsung made there own verison of that, and guess whos network it ran off? thats right Sprints, and where is that phone now? , the same place the instinct will be a year from now, no where to be found, way to go sprint... way to be creative for your customers, no wonder why everyone is leaving for AT&T and Verizon. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim_from_AT&T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, Tim, you are low on intelligence. Please stop posting so my mind doesn't puke. <br>To back that up, the RAZR NEVER WAS CARRIER SPECIFIC, dolt. Sprint did and does today have RAZRS, in fact the CDMA RAZR2 for SPRINT came out BEFORE the gsm RAZR2 on ATT. And by the way, your beloved ATT carries a lot of Samsung products and will probably get a gsm version of this same phone. CRY ABOUT IT, YOU IGNORANT, IGNORANT ASS.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Billy<br><br>If I can read correctly, it appears he is ridiculing Samsung for just copying everyone else's products, and he mentions the example of them copying the Razor.<br>If you are going to call someone "low on intelligence" in a comment, it helps to actually produce a quasi-legitimate counter argument and not some tenuous nonsense that isn't even relevant.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[^lol<br><br>I just moved "Please stop ______ so my mind doesn't puke" to the top of my list of phrases to integrate into my vocabulary. <br><br>But Billy is right about Sprint customers defecting in droves to ATT, although not in most cases to get an iphone, rather because Sprint CS sucks and the network quality/coverage is clearly 3rd best in the US...Sprint can undercut the big 2 on price but they also need quality devices to stop hemorrhaging customers and compete with the big boys.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[helixtimestwo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apparantly you've never compared the Motorola RAZR to the Samsung Blade. Sure, they have similar form factors, but the Sammy has a more useful rotating camera (use the external or internal screen as a viewfinder). The Samsung's UI, to me, is more intuitive. My Blade gets a little sluggish if you leave it on for a few days. A simple 'reboot' usually fixes that.<br><br>Anyways, the RAZR is simply not that great. Why do you think they're free now with a contract?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are all very pretty. No need to pull each others hair. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 10:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[the phone that Samsung made after the razr was actually better then the razr. I happen to still be using it because I haven't found a phone that i have liked more.    <br><br>There is acually a big fan base for the samsung A900m you would be surprised, it was and still is a great phone. And if i like the instinct i will pick it up cause it looks great and will be cheaper than the iphone. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to agree with Chris. I still have the a900 myself and it's been a great phone. Matter of fact, this month I've had it for 2 years and it's still going strong. <br><br>I am looking to upgrade phones this September when our contract is up. It's currently between 3 phones: The 3G iPhone, the Samsung Instinct and the Sony Ericsson EXPERIA X1. <br><br>My only hesitation with the X1 is it's using WinMo 6.1 and every single friend that I know that has a WinMo phone absolutely despises WinMo. Not just hates it, or dislikes it... despises it. That's not exactly a vote of confidence to switch to a WinMo phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bob<br><br>So there is no possibility of the X1 shipping with WM7?  I wouldn't be surprised if it does...microsoft has to be pushing hard now that LG and Samsung have entered the 'all touch' arena with Apple...not to mention that Android be probably show up late summer/early fall]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[helixtimestwo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[@helix:<br><br>Everything I've been reading about the X1 has said that it's going to be released with WinMo 6.1, as it'll be out in a few months, tops. WinMo7 is still being developed and, according to the internets, won't be released until 2009.<br><br>According to CNET, with regards to a WinMo 6.1 release, they say the following:<br><br>"Windows Mobile 6.1 will be available sometime in Q2, and a number of manufacturers (HTC, Samsung Electronics, Motorola, Pantech) and carriers (AT&T, Sprint, Alltel) have already announced that they will offer the upgrade. A sample of supported smartphones include the Samsung BlackJack II, AT&T Tilt, Sprint Motorola Q9c, Sprint Mogul, and Alltel Touch. For the full rundown of devices and features, check out the Microsoft Windows Mobile Web site."<br><br>CNET article:<br><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9905822-7.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9905822-7.html</a><br><br>MS official WinMo website:<br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/default.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/default.mspx</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll third the comments about the Samsung A900. I've got mine going on just about two years strong. It's been quality for me. That's why I'm intrigued by the prospect of getting another handset from them. I'll be at the store ASAP to play with this phone for a bit and if I like the haptic feedback keyboard, I'll pick it up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Littmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2008 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[umm billy ..you may want to question your own intelligence before you try and throw mines into question, i am fully aware that sprint has the razr but the point that i was getting at was this. When the razr was in its prime, every other carrier had the phone BUT sprint, instead of sprint hoping on the bandwagon with the other carriers, they decided it would be smarter to come out with a device that copied the razr. i am not here to debate who had the razr2 first my point is simply SPRINT's marketing team could of came out with something better then this...oh wait... let me guess you work for sprint ? lol ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim_from_AT&T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually TIM, the reason Sprint did not have the RAZR was not that it didn't want the phone it was because Motorola's JAVA Platform had problems with working with Sprint. Motorola was always late to develop a CDMA version of its phones which is why Verizon did not get its RAZR until way after AT&T and T-Mobile already had it. The reason Verizon got it before Sprint was because Verizon uses BREW and Moto was able to get it for Verizon before Sprint. Sprint wanted to bring the RAZR and other Motorola devices to its network but it needed to ensure that they would work properly with Sprints specifications, something that took a long time to work out. In the meantime Sprint was aware that the SLIM handset market was very popular and it needed to  get into it before it was too late which is WHY they had Samsung develop the A900 for Sprint. Samsung did not develop the phone specifically for Sprint because the phone was offered in Korea, just like the Instinct is based on an existing Samsung on a Korean network. Sprint used Samsung's devices because they already knew how to get the phone working properly on Sprint network without investing as much time as Moto needed to work out the kinks. Once Moto and Sprint worked out the issues, it released the RAZR on Sprint. The Samsung A900 was a very popular phone on Sprint its still used by many. It was and is a great device that IMHO is loads better than the CDMA RAZR V3m. As far as Sprint spending tons of money to advertise a phone that only works on the Sprint network, the same can be said about AT&T and Apple. Stateside the iPhone is only for the AT&T GSM network so what is the difference between Sprint advertising the Instinct versus AT&T and the iPhone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dont think you realize who you are bashing here. You are telling Sprint to be creative with their devices when it is Samsung making the phones (referencing to the RAZR analogy you came up with)? Sprint has almost no say in what companies like Samsung, LG, Motorola, etc has to or can develop. <br><br>If you want Samsung to stop creating crappy phones that are just a copy of another phone, voice your opinions to Samsung, not Sprint.<br><br>Because I would agree with you that Samsung's business model is pretty much just copying off of what is out there and not being creative at all. As for Sprint, I just think its a sinking ship :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wako]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tim <br><br>Fair's fair. I figured the more recent release would be more relevant than the release of the original RAZR, 3 YEARS AGO, which is lifetimes in the cell industry. And, no I don't work for Sprint or ATT but I do have to deal with and be knowledgeable about both in my line of work. In further disclosure, I DO in fact have Sprint service because, amazingly enough, Sprint has the only 3g service (EVDO) deployed in my area whereas the ATT tower guys around here have been telling me "6-8 months" for almost two years. Oh yeah, and their data plan is cheaper. But I'm not a Sprint Nazi nor do I have any kind of loyalty to any carrier because I think they all exist to rip people off :) Hope you're enjoying your Sunday.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh...and i forgot to mention that when SPRINT finally decided to get up off there ass and get the razr...nobody cared about the razr anymore...so please get your facts straight  :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim_from_AT&T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh and by the way since we're starting 5 threads in here, I don't care about the RAZR. I don't care about the Iphone. This Instinct phone looks like garbage as well. I like HTC phones because they are powerful and hackable, but I wouldn't dream of shoving my preferences down other peoples throats. In case you don't read my other comment: I DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO ANY FORM OF CARRIER OR BRAND LOYALTY BECAUSE I THINK THEY ARE ALL CROOKS AND I JUST WANT TO GET THE BEST DEAL THNX.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 9:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh...and one last thing... sprint is spending top notch money to market the instinct which was designed for the SPRINT network only ...once again billy please get your facts straight. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim_from_AT&T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2008 6:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, are you some kind of moron? Soooooo many phones were supposed to be for someone's network ONLY and then six months later every carrier has it (yes, the laughably glorious Iphone is and will continue to be an exception.) But please tell me of any phone other than the Iphone where this is the case (and don't bring up the sidekick or other phones where the carrier is basically the manufacturer) The Motorola Q was supposed to be Sprint-only. The LG Rumor too (WHOOPS they call it the  <br>scoop on AllTel  and something else entirely on Verizon, but it's the EXACT SAME PHONE) Same with the Palm Centro. I could go on, but I have a feeling you were literally born yesterday since you have no real grasp of trhe cell industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not to be totally partial to the iPhone, but come on. Will Samsung ever be able to actually create something new and different, and not just rip off everyone else's products??<br><br>This is going to be a second-rate iPhone clone like the others. The touchscreen won't be capacitive, the interface will be unresponsive and obtuse to navigate, and the touchscreen keyboard won't come anywhere near the practicality of the iPhones.<br><br>Even in a couple of years when these companies get something that can run as smooth and fluid as the iPhone, If they still use a shitty OS, like Samsungs proprietary crap or Windows mobile, they just won't compete. The next stage of the iPhone dominance will most likely be with the rise of mobile OSX as the software platform of choice for mobile devices. With the coming flood of useful, intuitive applications once the new firmware and App store launches, It will be very difficult for others to compete. The one saving grace for these manufacturers will be Android, if they don't manage to screw up their implementation of it.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did Sammy all of a sudden move its headquarters to China?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Razor1973]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2008 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 9th 2008 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd sign up for buying one of those if it had wifi too.  Who wants to pay $99 a month for phone service?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2008 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish Verizon would get visual voice mail :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2008 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't see how people cannot think this will be better than the iPhone.  EVDO Rev A out of the box and built in GPS alone make it better.  That combined with the fact that Samsung makes excellent handsets.  Who cares if they mimic or copy other designs.  More often than not they improve on them, just like the A900 over the RAZR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 12:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[but the features are only as useful as the interface to them. we'll have to see how good the os and touch input are for anything else to matter]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 9th 2008 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint licenses Visual Voicemail for the Samsung Instinct]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/06/sprint-licenses-visual-voicemail-for-the-samsung-instinct/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi, I have nowhere else to ask this, but does anyone know whether the Sprint Touch will have a price drop soon? It's been stuck at $250 on the Sprint site for half a year, you'd think that they would drop it by $50 or $100. I'm trying to get the Touch with the Sero plan, which is why I don't want to buy it through Amazon (which is $150 after rebates). Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Feng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 1:59AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>