wow, instead of using there marketing team to come up with there own idea of a cool phone for sprint, they just copy a idea thats already been done...lol wow... i remember when the razr phone came out and samsung....YES samsung made there own verison of that, and guess whos network it ran off? thats right Sprints, and where is that phone now? , the same place the instinct will be a year from now, no where to be found, way to go sprint... way to be creative for your customers, no wonder why everyone is leaving for AT&T and Verizon.
Hey, Tim, you are low on intelligence. Please stop posting so my mind doesn't puke. To back that up, the RAZR NEVER WAS CARRIER SPECIFIC, dolt. Sprint did and does today have RAZRS, in fact the CDMA RAZR2 for SPRINT came out BEFORE the gsm RAZR2 on ATT. And by the way, your beloved ATT carries a lot of Samsung products and will probably get a gsm version of this same phone. CRY ABOUT IT, YOU IGNORANT, IGNORANT ASS.
If I can read correctly, it appears he is ridiculing Samsung for just copying everyone else's products, and he mentions the example of them copying the Razor. If you are going to call someone "low on intelligence" in a comment, it helps to actually produce a quasi-legitimate counter argument and not some tenuous nonsense that isn't even relevant.
I just moved "Please stop ______ so my mind doesn't puke" to the top of my list of phrases to integrate into my vocabulary.
But Billy is right about Sprint customers defecting in droves to ATT, although not in most cases to get an iphone, rather because Sprint CS sucks and the network quality/coverage is clearly 3rd best in the US...Sprint can undercut the big 2 on price but they also need quality devices to stop hemorrhaging customers and compete with the big boys.
Apparantly you've never compared the Motorola RAZR to the Samsung Blade. Sure, they have similar form factors, but the Sammy has a more useful rotating camera (use the external or internal screen as a viewfinder). The Samsung's UI, to me, is more intuitive. My Blade gets a little sluggish if you leave it on for a few days. A simple 'reboot' usually fixes that.
Anyways, the RAZR is simply not that great. Why do you think they're free now with a contract?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
wow, instead of using there marketing team to come up with there own idea of a cool phone for sprint, they just copy a idea thats already been done...lol wow... i remember when the razr phone came out and samsung....YES samsung made there own verison of that, and guess whos network it ran off? thats right Sprints, and where is that phone now? , the same place the instinct will be a year from now, no where to be found, way to go sprint... way to be creative for your customers, no wonder why everyone is leaving for AT&T and Verizon.
Hey, Tim, you are low on intelligence. Please stop posting so my mind doesn't puke.
To back that up, the RAZR NEVER WAS CARRIER SPECIFIC, dolt. Sprint did and does today have RAZRS, in fact the CDMA RAZR2 for SPRINT came out BEFORE the gsm RAZR2 on ATT. And by the way, your beloved ATT carries a lot of Samsung products and will probably get a gsm version of this same phone. CRY ABOUT IT, YOU IGNORANT, IGNORANT ASS.
@Billy
If I can read correctly, it appears he is ridiculing Samsung for just copying everyone else's products, and he mentions the example of them copying the Razor.
If you are going to call someone "low on intelligence" in a comment, it helps to actually produce a quasi-legitimate counter argument and not some tenuous nonsense that isn't even relevant.
^lol
I just moved "Please stop ______ so my mind doesn't puke" to the top of my list of phrases to integrate into my vocabulary.
But Billy is right about Sprint customers defecting in droves to ATT, although not in most cases to get an iphone, rather because Sprint CS sucks and the network quality/coverage is clearly 3rd best in the US...Sprint can undercut the big 2 on price but they also need quality devices to stop hemorrhaging customers and compete with the big boys.
Apparantly you've never compared the Motorola RAZR to the Samsung Blade. Sure, they have similar form factors, but the Sammy has a more useful rotating camera (use the external or internal screen as a viewfinder). The Samsung's UI, to me, is more intuitive. My Blade gets a little sluggish if you leave it on for a few days. A simple 'reboot' usually fixes that.
Anyways, the RAZR is simply not that great. Why do you think they're free now with a contract?
You are all very pretty. No need to pull each others hair.