<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</guid><description><![CDATA[HAHA, love that pic near the end, "This site requires flash, you are using flash player version 0"<br><br>All in all, seems Android is coming along nicely. I think the thing I like most about it is that as far as I know, anyone can make an application to run on an android phone, (is this correct?). Such a far cry from the walled gardens of apps with carriers like Verizon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gareth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 10th 2008 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</guid><description><![CDATA[But does it play--*looks at title*<br><br>Hrm, I guess it does. Carry on.<br><br>------<br><br>I love the way they show this amazing platform off-I like it a lot, looks very WinMo-ish, not a knock off, just similiar--on such a crappy made-just-to-display-the-platform phone. I guess it didn't want the display phone's form to take away from the platform's function. Anyway, I'm very optimistic about Android. Also, AT&T's looking to pick it up; that just makes it that much better for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like Android as much as I hate Qualcomm, which should be the one chipmaker NOT involved with Android. This company sucks licensing rights out of every feature of their hardware (video drivers on kaiser, touch cruise, etc) and isn't "open" to anything except sucking the money out of your pockets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android does one better at CTIA, plays Quake]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/08/android-does-one-better-at-ctia-plays-quake/</guid><description><![CDATA[My next phone will be an Android. I can't wait until this is final!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[retro77]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 4:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>