<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, I been told by people high up in VZW that the new PTT is Rev A based, does it have to be "QChat" if it uses Rev A?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 24th 2008 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, Qualcomm will just rake it in won't it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 24th 2008 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was wondering when this would be corrected.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[0157h7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 24th 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</guid><description><![CDATA[It almost sounds like Qualcomm is saying to Sprint "yes, you can have exclusive use of the 'Q-Chat' PTT system we developed" and to Verizon "you can use this PTT system we developed, just don't call it 'Q-Chat' - that's Sprint's name for it."<br><br>Actually sounds a bit shady. :(<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 2:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon's next-gen PTT is not QChat]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/24/verizons-next-gen-ptt-is-not-qchat/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish all the networks would be willing to join their PTT networks.  It's not like people are like "DuDE, do u have VZ PTT? Cuz all my friends have it!"<br>I just got my Nextel since most law enforcement/emergency services personnel use it.  It's be nice if my TyTn II 's ATT PTT could cross the barrier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 2:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>