<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just get a 3G connection and a Slingbox already... Sheesh. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Juice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here's my take: <a href="http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/lg-vu-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/" rel="nofollow">http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/lg-vu-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tnkgrl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to see Apple take a shot at the Mobile TV service with the next iPhone, now that would be cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Live TV sucks.  Gimme Orb/Slingbox over that crap any day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CB17]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[i went to a corporate store and was about to but a Vu but it turns out not only do you have to subscribe to the $15 for the Mobile TV but also another $15 dollars for the unlimited data usage since it has to connect to the internet to work.  Since it was $30 i just decided to buy the pearl and left.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[topspin4592]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 10:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[the rep was wrong. at&t has freakin TERRIBLE PISS POOR training! i should know, used to work there. lol. not the fault of the trainers. the fault of the company not having materials, not scheduling time, or hiring idiot workers because they had to and the turn over rate is so high.<br><br>anyway, back to ur comment. you DO NOT need internet. Mobile TV does NOT use the internet. it uses over the air broadcast. only MobiTV uses the internet, which is something different altogether, has been out for years, and works on most phones.<br><br>within 30 days of purchase, you should be able to:<br>1) return that phone<br>2) tell them u want a credit for your freakin inconvenience, misinformation, and having to drive all around town twice<br>3) exchange it for a vu. <br><br>:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 11:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's actually not true. They use two different services. You pay $15 for the tv but you don't need the internet. It's true though that if you want the unlimited internet you can pay the additional $15 for it. <br>Whatever rep told you that you needed both just wanted to rip you off.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vietgal2002]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2008 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although I was delighted with using the iPhone/iTouch they are not available on Verizon so I was quite anxious to try the LG VU from AT&T as I believe this unit will soon be released on Verizon as the LG 9700.  I did feel it necessary to pay AT&T the $15 for TV plus another $15 for unlimited data transfer.  As a casual and somewhat inexperience user, I found the TV services the easiest service to use on the LG VU.  Even easier than trying to make a phone call.  Turn it on and simpley press the TV button.  In about less than 10 seconds it delivers.  I was facinated by the TV service except for MTV and Sponge Bob.  I'm not into cartoons but it is nice for those with a need or cartoon interest.  For those people, they probably don't appreciate my interest in CNN and the other news broadcasts.  Program selection was clear and easy.  Scroll up or down and touch your desired program listing.  My other interest was email, limited texting, web surfing and making phone calls.  After spending about 2 days with the LG VU, I was unable to connect to any email, texting on the virtual keyboard produced numerous errors as well as making numerous errors in phone number dialing due to the virtual keypad.  I do not have fat fingers, so perhaps with more time and careful experience, I could reduce my error rate.  My largest frustration came with internet access.  Entering URL was not an easy process and again took numerous attempts via the virtual keyboard.  Once a page appeared, I found it very cumbersom navigate the page, to read and scroll.  Still after 2 days, I was unable to connect to my computer for calendar, pictures and music download.  Many of you are probably also saying I should use a phone with real keyboard.  This could be true, however, when I demo'd the iPhone, within only a few hours of receipt, I was able to download ALL contacts, calendar, music, pictures, yahoo email, surf the REAL internet, read, with a fair amount of ease, actual web pages, have near instant access to multiple stocks, and weather pages, plus, I was able to make a phone call.  The LG VU is probably a great device for the experienced user that also finds the TV service interesting.  I have read it to be on par with iPhone.  For my demands for ease of use, it is not even in the same ball field except for the TV service.  For my use I have returned the LG VU after 3 days use and will be waiting for the NEW iPhone.  Due to ease of use, I'll gladly pay the extra $100 for iPhone.  It does not have TV but perhaps with 3G on the new version, TV services will become available.  That would be the absolute home run.  I am not normally an Apple advocate, however, they have redefined usage of the cell phone market some how raising the bar far beyond where the legacy manufactures have yet to even come close, even after a year of trying to play catch-up.  With a new iPhone release in que, I can only assume the bar will be raised once again.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[b batts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with the LG Vu, Samsung Access, and AT&amp;T Mobile TV]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/12/hands-on-with-the-lg-vu-samsung-access-and-atandt-mobile-tv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am a tad bit pissy that ATT has exclusivity to Pix and CNN. I have the Voyager with Verizon and would love the 2 additional channels. They teased me with Pix on the preview channel of my Voyager. :-( I still favor my Network, but dang, can we get some of the cooler features guys?! It's the small things that can sometimes be the greatest appeasers, like offering every aspect of an available feature. Ok, so we added TR3's (now I have 2 MTV's) and ESPN radio (boooo). I WANT A MOVIE CHANNEL and CNN (which offers greater national coverage than NBC NEWS ON THE GO).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xclsiv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 10:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>