Seriously what is it with the anti Chinese sentiment and cold war mentality in all your posts concerning anything Chinese you friggin schmuck(s)? I mean is it the norm over at engadget for you cocksuckers to attack anything and everything Chinese? Chinese companies knocking off the iPhone always hear it from you fuckers, but when companies like Nokia and samsung blatantly knock it off, the question becomes "how can you not knock it off when trying to make a touch phone?" And the UI is not very different in any good way either to differentiate those POS LG and Samsung phones from the Chinese knock offs either, it just seems you guys take it up the ass from everyone but Chinese companies right?
i'm not sure where your comment came from, but it certainly wasn't this post. u obviously have something built up inside of u and felt for some reason that chris/em should get the brunt of it. what the hell do u feel was attacked? youre either on the defensive or have zero reading comprehension skills.
let me break it down for u. chris is a real blogger, not an internet celebrity. so to help tell his story, is me, an internet celebrity:
"Though it's recently cracked the tough outer shell of the rough-and-tumble US wireless market, Huawei's got a long way to go before it can stand toe-to-toe with the Samsungs and LGs of the world." -99 carriers of phones on the list. 99 carriers of phones. theyve taken one down, passed some cell phones around. still 98 carriers of phones on the list.
"The economy's seen better days, the market is nearly saturated, and it already seems like there might be a couple players too many for profit" -the US economy is down. its goin into the ground. but huawei wants to stick around.
"so what's an up-and-coming Chinese firm to do? Invite foreign investment, naturally. Huawei has retained Morgan Stanley to help it line up investors" -gimme gimme doh. gimme doh. gimme gimme doh.
"that can bulk it up enough to wage a broadsided offense against the low-end American market, leaving the mid and high-range lineups to the well-established companies that are already making a splash up there." -ok seems like u might need plain english for this one. they are going to focus on inexpensive handsets like the ones theyve been making already instead of making feature filled or smart phones.
"It's pretty rare for a Chinese corporation of Huawei's size and clout to open itself up to cash from outside Chinese borders, so the deal's expected to attract a lot of interest" -look over there! its a bird, its a plane, no... ...its a deal to get in on a chinese cell phone maker and im interested!
"theoretically setting the scene for plenty more of its wares on US carriers' shelves. We're all for healthy competition, and if Huawei can shake things up a bit, we're all for it." -theyve got it! yeah baby theyve got!
there. i have literally interpreted the entire post for u. i fail to see what was "anti-chinese" about it. if anything, they said it is going to attract interest, result in more phones, and they are "all for it."
sorry man, but i'm not going to interpret any more posts for you. before you decide to comment on anything again, you should really have mommy or daddy explain the article to you first.
PS: "Chinese companies knocking off the iPhone always hear it from you" -yeah, because they are phones that are total knock offs (as you inferred in your own sentence) and they were designed to be knock offs. im sure a clothing company making "adidaas" shirts would be discussed in the same manner on a blog about fashion.
"Nokia and samsung blatantly knock it off" -their phones are not knock offs and were not designed to be knock offs. let me repeat for you, most of the chinese ones WERE MEANT TO BE knock offs.
"the question becomes 'how can you not knock it off when trying to make a touch phone?'" -no, the question becomes "wow what kind of idiots are out there in this world?" and yes, i have you in mind. when people say nokia and samsung phones are knock offs, they are usually basing that on the looks, just because it is a touch screen phone that has few or no buttons and rounded edges. beyond that, the phones are completely different. the os, hardware, features, and other parts of the design are their own. arguably even the look is its own. so yes, how many different ways are there to have a retangular touch screen phone with few or no buttons look? but the chinese knockoffs are purposely designed to look, feel, and sometimes operate the same way. if you cannot understand the difference after my explanation, then maybe the studies are correct that cell phone use can cause brain damage. u must be a heavy talker! oh, by the way, did you read about the new study that said phones are yummy with sugar on them? go shove one down your throat, ktnxbai.
one more thing "ann" "dude" or whoever u r... ur wild claims are getting really old and if you dont like EM so much then why do you keep reading it? it might be different if you had some solid evidence to back up your remarks, but looking through your history reveals a continued pattern of slander. if you really believe what you are saying is true, why are you so ashamed of stating your name? i enjoy reading EM and most of the intelligent discussion that takes place here, but i dont appreciate you bringing such trash into the community.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Seriously what is it with the anti Chinese sentiment and cold war mentality in all your posts concerning anything Chinese you friggin schmuck(s)?
I mean is it the norm over at engadget for you cocksuckers to attack anything and everything Chinese?
Chinese companies knocking off the iPhone always hear it from you fuckers, but when companies like Nokia and samsung blatantly knock it off, the question becomes "how can you not knock it off when trying to make a touch phone?"
And the UI is not very different in any good way either to differentiate those POS LG and Samsung phones from the Chinese knock offs either, it just seems you guys take it up the ass from everyone but Chinese companies right?
wow. just wow.
i'm not sure where your comment came from, but it certainly wasn't this post. u obviously have something built up inside of u and felt for some reason that chris/em should get the brunt of it. what the hell do u feel was attacked? youre either on the defensive or have zero reading comprehension skills.
let me break it down for u. chris is a real blogger, not an internet celebrity. so to help tell his story, is me, an internet celebrity:
"Though it's recently cracked the tough outer shell of the rough-and-tumble US wireless market, Huawei's got a long way to go before it can stand toe-to-toe with the Samsungs and LGs of the world."
-99 carriers of phones on the list. 99 carriers of phones. theyve taken one down, passed some cell phones around. still 98 carriers of phones on the list.
"The economy's seen better days, the market is nearly saturated, and it already seems like there might be a couple players too many for profit"
-the US economy is down. its goin into the ground. but huawei wants to stick around.
"so what's an up-and-coming Chinese firm to do? Invite foreign investment, naturally. Huawei has retained Morgan Stanley to help it line up investors"
-gimme gimme doh. gimme doh. gimme gimme doh.
"that can bulk it up enough to wage a broadsided offense against the low-end American market, leaving the mid and high-range lineups to the well-established companies that are already making a splash up there."
-ok seems like u might need plain english for this one.
they are going to focus on inexpensive handsets like the ones theyve been making already instead of making feature filled or smart phones.
"It's pretty rare for a Chinese corporation of Huawei's size and clout to open itself up to cash from outside Chinese borders, so the deal's expected to attract a lot of interest"
-look over there! its a bird, its a plane, no... ...its a deal to get in on a chinese cell phone maker and im interested!
"theoretically setting the scene for plenty more of its wares on US carriers' shelves. We're all for healthy competition, and if Huawei can shake things up a bit, we're all for it."
-theyve got it! yeah baby theyve got!
there. i have literally interpreted the entire post for u. i fail to see what was "anti-chinese" about it. if anything, they said it is going to attract interest, result in more phones, and they are "all for it."
sorry man, but i'm not going to interpret any more posts for you. before you decide to comment on anything again, you should really have mommy or daddy explain the article to you first.
PS:
"Chinese companies knocking off the iPhone always hear it from you"
-yeah, because they are phones that are total knock offs (as you inferred in your own sentence) and they were designed to be knock offs. im sure a clothing company making "adidaas" shirts would be discussed in the same manner on a blog about fashion.
"Nokia and samsung blatantly knock it off"
-their phones are not knock offs and were not designed to be knock offs. let me repeat for you, most of the chinese ones WERE MEANT TO BE knock offs.
"the question becomes 'how can you not knock it off when trying to make a touch phone?'"
-no, the question becomes "wow what kind of idiots are out there in this world?" and yes, i have you in mind. when people say nokia and samsung phones are knock offs, they are usually basing that on the looks, just because it is a touch screen phone that has few or no buttons and rounded edges. beyond that, the phones are completely different. the os, hardware, features, and other parts of the design are their own. arguably even the look is its own. so yes, how many different ways are there to have a retangular touch screen phone with few or no buttons look? but the chinese knockoffs are purposely designed to look, feel, and sometimes operate the same way. if you cannot understand the difference after my explanation, then maybe the studies are correct that cell phone use can cause brain damage. u must be a heavy talker! oh, by the way, did you read about the new study that said phones are yummy with sugar on them? go shove one down your throat, ktnxbai.
one more thing "ann" "dude" or whoever u r... ur wild claims are getting really old and if you dont like EM so much then why do you keep reading it? it might be different if you had some solid evidence to back up your remarks, but looking through your history reveals a continued pattern of slander. if you really believe what you are saying is true, why are you so ashamed of stating your name? i enjoy reading EM and most of the intelligent discussion that takes place here, but i dont appreciate you bringing such trash into the community.