<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Mouse Phone totally disregards Mickey trademark</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/28/mouse-phone-totally-disregards-mickey-trademark/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Mouse Phone totally disregards Mickey trademark</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mouse Phone totally disregards Mickey trademark]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/28/mouse-phone-totally-disregards-mickey-trademark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/05/28/mouse-phone-totally-disregards-mickey-trademark/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be honest, though, the trademark on Mickey Mouse would have expired (multiple times over), except that Congress keeps on extending the trademark period every time Mickey comes close to being in the public domain.<br><br>They (congress) have recently been challenged in the courts about what amounts to a "perpertual" trademark, and sooner or later, Congress will balk at Disney's request, and Mickey will be public domain.  It's already been over 100 years, let the trademark expire already. <br><br>While the law is the law, it's being abused (or pushed beyond its intended purpose) by Congress at the behest of Disney, I think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2008 9:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>