actually Beanspants and MMisterio are right IMO, I thought this was going to be a proper comparo not just a gallery...
I think it's pathetic how everyone jumped down MMisterios throat to "save the editor". Ziegler's work on this site is good, but a calling out is a calling out.
i dont mind of a just photo post, but you could at least take some shots from the sides, stack them up, compare their thickness....... all ur pics look similar, just different zoom, different screen display
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
so is there an actual article or do you consider a couple of crappy pictures enough to be "blog worthy"
So is there an actual constructive statement here, or do you consider a couple of crappy words enough to be "comment worthy"?
Ooooooooohhhh, in yo' face, son!!!!
BURN!
i agree. all you did was go to a speed test site once, then take some pictures, and you have the nerve to call out his call-out?
how about moving around some? or making a call, or comparing features or something?
or re-title the article as "one-off speed test between X,X,X".
actually Beanspants and MMisterio are right IMO, I thought this was going to be a proper comparo not just a gallery...
I think it's pathetic how everyone jumped down MMisterios throat to "save the editor". Ziegler's work on this site is good, but a calling out is a calling out.
i dont mind of a just photo post, but you could at least take some shots from the sides, stack them up, compare their thickness.......
all ur pics look similar, just different zoom, different screen display