<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe be two better, but that doesn't help it much since its in the negatives in my book.<br><br>WM6.1 is a nice touch though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 3rd 2008 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[PLZ STOP THE Q's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsaxmafia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 3rd 2008 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or at least put a touchscreen and WM6.1 pro already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[furiousyellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 3rd 2008 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully Motorola has more luck then Sony Ericcson has with the xperia x1 in getting their smartphone to work, as Sony Ericcson just delayed their xperia x1 again because Windows Mobile 6.0 crashes the phone.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xperia x1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2008 1:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[i love my q the only thing i say its really missing is wifi<br><br>i hate touch screens so thats the last thing i want]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bufsabre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q11 is probably like the Q9, but two better]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/03/motorola-q11-is-probably-like-the-q9-but-two-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it me or does the Q11 look very similar to the Ipaq 910C??????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2008 9:28AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>