http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/ Engadget Mobile Comments for HTC Touch HD takes 480 x 800 pixels fullscreen http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
I wonder what the screen size is on that, hopefully as large as it's likely competitor.]]>Sep 10th 2008 9:37AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 12:58PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 9:42AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 9:46AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 9:47AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 11:10AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
Cannot WAit to get More Information on this Device!

Really EXciting Times in Cell Technology!!!!

WHOot WHoot!!!

- D]]>Sep 10th 2008 10:17AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
This is very impressive.]]>Sep 10th 2008 10:20AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
I also hope they have more storage than my iPhone 3G and the touch so I can carry my entire music collection and videos. (Its just silly for a media device to be short on storage.)
M]]>Sep 10th 2008 11:22AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/(we want to be like iPhone too!)]]>Sep 10th 2008 10:24AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
That's like saying every FPS just wants to be like doom.]]>Sep 10th 2008 11:48AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Concerning the screen size, the device has almost exactly the same dimensions as the iPhone, but judging from the pics, the screen uses more space. Adding the fact that it has WVGA display, I guess the screen size will be something like 3,7" or so. So finger-navigation must be perfect.]]>Sep 10th 2008 11:56AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 12:01PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 12:52PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
In other news, this device is extremely sexy. A must have!]]>Sep 10th 2008 6:54PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/ HSDPA. Sprints network is way faster than cingulars.]]>Sep 11th 2008 10:26AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 10:45AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 10:50AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 11:16AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/wait for it...
hmm nothing, think i even heard a needle drop
where's the apple fanboys?
thought i seen em heading up the hills, and now don't forget, cos they cant compare the screen size anddisplay resolution anymore, here they come to bash winmo 6.1 or maybe the screen is too big or maybe the button is too red.]]>Sep 10th 2008 10:59AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
back on topic. This seems to be more of the same.. I mean what are they bringing different to the table than the Diamond? Capacitive screen? Proper Accelerometer? Android?. The processor is a tad faster but with crappy WinMo6.1 on there it needs to be at least 1Ghz with 512MB Ram.

Bring something new with this HTC.. don't just change the form factor of your existing phones and call it "new"]]>Sep 10th 2008 11:32AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
I know Hitachi had a phone running at a similar resolution, so did the LG LH2300, but neither of them are in the market yet either!

Besides, HTC's UI shell for WinMo seems very attractive and fluid. Also the other phones have been developed for specific markets, IMHO.

This one *might* be the more generalized high-res phone around...]]>Sep 10th 2008 12:15PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 12:24PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 12:59PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
No doubt a fantastic phone but it will take away buyers from the X1 .

But even more amazing! it going to be in time for WM 7!]]>Sep 10th 2008 1:33PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 6:42PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 2:34PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Camera 4,9 MP.
The only problem i see : it's the same processor than the Diamond, which means it should be slow as hell :(]]>Sep 11th 2008 2:33AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 4:47PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 11:01PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 4:47PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 11:00PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 4:54PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
Should be the first of many pre-announcement leaks.

This is 'almost' enough to make me delay purchasing the HTC Touch Pro...almost. Either way, HTC is getting my $$$.]]>Sep 10th 2008 5:45PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 6:23PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 9:18PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/Sep 10th 2008 9:18PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/10/htc-touch-hd-takes-480-x-800-pixels-fullscreen/
Why cant you just let me buy something?

First the Diamond, then i waited for the Pro, then I was waiting for the X1 (HTC Made), now im waiting for this?

Most exciting announcment by any phone maker since the X1. This is going to be sweet. Ive used the Diamond, and there is very little keeping me from picking that up since its out now. That "very little" just grew a bit.]]>Sep 10th 2008 11:06PM