<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although this is pretty cool, I'm afraid it's not really that important for people since, on a 2" screen, even qvga is enough.<br>But I have to say it's quite a technological achievement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hamza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 7:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Resolution is everything when it comes to web surfing no matter how small the screen is. *points and laugh at Nokia Symbian users*<br>PPI too small? Hold the screen closer!<br>These day VGA is the absolute minimum.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wuzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 7:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[....and 640K is enough memory for everyone...BLAH!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiwi616]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[That would mean a 4" screen could be in HD (if they can pull it off doubling their numbers) 1980x1080. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 7:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally a decent screen for mobile porn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[At 546 ppi, this is too dense for me since I can no longer focus much closer than 10".  But if you can focus down to 6.3", then why not?  I'm fine with around 200-300 ppi myself so this screen at around 4" (with a viewing distance of about a foot) would be great.<br><br>d = 60 / (atan(1deg)*ppi) is the distance to view for 60 pixels per degree.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dara Parsavand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I couldn't agree more.  This ppi is way over the top.  The pixels are way too small for any real utility.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't care if it was 1080p, 2" screen = pass]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plh2034]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio goes insane with 2-inch, 960 x 540 pixel LCD]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/09/25/casio-goes-insane-with-2-inch-960-x-540-pixel-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's very interesting. Human vision has a real-world limit of about 300 ppi in both the X & Y axis at a standard reading distance. This screen easily exceeds that. I didn't expect this to happen for some time. With any luck they will be able to scale this technology for larger displays.<br><br>Where did they get 546 ppi in the original post? I got ~550 ppi (550.7267925 ppi, to be more exact).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paralel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 6:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>