<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Apple drops iPhone NDA</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Apple drops iPhone NDA</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not sure how I can understand the term "iPhone Software" here. Is it the OS itself or the applications developed on top of it ?<br><br>Because if it's about the custom applications only, I would understand the second to last sentence as a restriction for public code-development and solution exchange for specific scenarios.<br>So a application in Appstore is officially not allowed to be developed by a public community, it must be a confidential entity<br><br>I might be wrong here...<br><br>am I wrong ? *scratch*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, by accident I commented the blog that's barely visited...<br><br>Might be a good idea to link both Engadget and Engadget mobile to the same comments, in case they share the same posting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ugh! Me McSuckin and all I can say is "Who gives a CRAP about ME?" because I SUCK!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McLovin SUCKS!!!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[ha, funny this comes out AFTER the g1 gets some coverage.  apple is shaking in their boots. about time though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[moose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah, that's for SURE!!!  - D<br><br>Whiny, Defensive Brat that Apple is!!!<br><br>BWahaHAhahaaaa<br><br>TOo bad for them after the Exclusive Agreement they have with ATT they plan on Offering iPhone to All other Carriers so they'd BETTER start doing Something More than they have been.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galen20K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[soooooo....will this open any possibility of people being able to edit software and possibly include MMS and copy & paste???? (wishful thinking)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bugger! I was hopping Apple kept its stance up and let Android eat into its market share before realising it's too late.<br>Apple caved in.... WHY?! Steve 'Blow' Jobs needs to harden up!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wuzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2008 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple drops iPhone NDA]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/01/apple-drops-iphone-nda/</guid><description><![CDATA[The NDA sucked, and now that this bit has dropped, I wonder if developers will be allowed to talk about the "approval process" that Apple uses to let apps in the store - or whatever it is that they use.  This is where the real transparency is needed.  The guidelines are unclear, and developers drop something into iTunesConnect only to find their app sitting there in a queue with no email, no phone calls, nothing from Apple as to what is going on.  It's time to blow the whistle on this and force some transparency.  If Apple does not get this bit fixed, it will certainly see developers racing to Android.  <br><br>How about it Apple?  How about some insight into your supposed approval process?  Why make developers shell out time and money for creative that you may or may not choose to allow?  And you may or may not ever tell what is going on once submitted?  This isn't the selection of a new pope...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ebs008]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2008 8:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>