I am thinking the same thing as Sean Allen... where does it say ANYWHERE that the EPIX is the i907? So far all I have seen is that BGR is claiming it is, but it just doesn't make sense that the i907 would be something other than the Omnia/Mirage.
Think i600/i607... i900/i907? I don't see why they would deviate from their numbering pattern.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but can anyone shed some light?
i think they're grabbing that number from the leaked timeline sheet, which shows a release date of the same day. who knows, they could be dropping 3 huge phones on us. the touch pro (fuze), omnia, and epix ?!?!
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I don't see where it shows that the Samsung Epix is the i907. If you have a picture or proof of this why aren't you showing this?
I am thinking the same thing as Sean Allen... where does it say ANYWHERE that the EPIX is the i907? So far all I have seen is that BGR is claiming it is, but it just doesn't make sense that the i907 would be something other than the Omnia/Mirage.
Think i600/i607... i900/i907? I don't see why they would deviate from their numbering pattern.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but can anyone shed some light?
i think they're grabbing that number from the leaked timeline sheet, which shows a release date of the same day. who knows, they could be dropping 3 huge phones on us. the touch pro (fuze), omnia, and epix ?!?!