<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Samsung shows off W600 with T-DMB, HSUPA, 5MP camera</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/19/samsung-shows-off-w600-with-t-dmb-hsupa-5mp-camera/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Samsung shows off W600 with T-DMB, HSUPA, 5MP camera</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung shows off W600 with T-DMB, HSUPA, 5MP camera]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/19/samsung-shows-off-w600-with-t-dmb-hsupa-5mp-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/19/samsung-shows-off-w600-with-t-dmb-hsupa-5mp-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Urgh, Samsung's doing it again. Okay, remember when the RAZR was released and eventually manufacturers started producing really, really thin phones Samsung was the first to flood the market with thin phones. I love choice--choice is amazing. But a lot of the phones are really, really similar and somewhat quotidian devices. It seems to be the same thing all over again with this full touchscreen cell phone market fad.<br><br>I mean, LG's touchscreen devices are memorable--LG Prada line, Dare, Voyager, Vu--etc..But Samsung just seems to pump these out...idk, also, I'm not really a fan of Samsung so that might (read: definitely) have something to do with it.<br><br>I guess in the end everyone wins. It'll force other manufacturers to make amazing touchscreen phones, I guess. I'd just prefer quality over quantity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2008 6:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>