<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really love the elegance of ARM architecture: RISC, no legacy X86, very power efficient, and hardware integration of mobile components.<br>With Windows Mobile 7 coming, I hope the future of ARM will enter and replace x86 desktop PCs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BoyBawang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 5:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[> [...] the iPhone wouldn't suck if they'd<br>> gone with an Intel stack [...]<br><br>So Intel has a GSM/GPRS/EDGE/WCDMA radio stack now?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lejupp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 4:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow! They can be jealous all they want, but blaming the ARM architecture for the iPhone's weak web browsing prowess is ridiculous and irresponsible! I guess Nokia's latest Nseries devices with Flash enabled browsers, the best, most desktop-like mobile browsing environment available, shouldn't be so good then. They all run ARM processors as well. <br><br>I wish the incumbent titans shut up whenever they get embarrassed by competitors...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christexaport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Just what Intel based CPU should the iPhone use?  An Atom?  You'd need to carry around a battery bigger than the iPhone itself, on some tether, in order to have a decent battery life.   But, I guess, that'd solve the removable battery problem...<br><br>ARM's one and ONLY problem is that it's not x86 compatible.  Which is only a problem if you care about x86 compatibility.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well I'd say this is a pretty clear indication that Intel has something cooking for the MID/Smartphone sector that is x86.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPhone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maneton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel: ARM's the reason the iPhone... sucks?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/intel-arms-the-reason-the-iphone-sucks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think somebody at Intel really loves the trash talk, first Nvidia, now ARM... who's next? <br><br>He is right though, how many fully open ARM devices are there that will run any compiled code in widespread adoption? N8*0? GP2X? Boards sold by digikey? Yep, those are widespread (I'm not being facetious). ARM stuff is locked down way too often and therefore not too smart. Sorry iPhone. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>