<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[duh<br><br>It's been known since the symbian foundation announcement: get the best UI (s60) and fold UIQ techs into it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For touchscreen devices UIQ is so much better than S60.<br><br>Well.. RIP. [insert funeral for UIQ here]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[probably it's a sign SE may join OHA and dump UIQ<br>it's dead-end platform]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mingkee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 10:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[RIP!!!<br>What great days where those when SE P800 was released!!!<br>The fail of UIQ only has only one face, Sony Ericsson himself....<br>A mobile company that wants to establish "their" platform cannot only release one device per year and sometimes with serveral setbacks...<br>For ex, Nokia release several devices per year, although too many, and this ways many people could choose from a wide array of solutions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Onesolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2008 5:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad it finally died, it's been on borrowed time for months. Slow, inefficient, buggy, overly complex, poor UI and difficult to develop for, I don't think it had any redeeming features.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 24th 2008 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson says UIQ is teh sux, probably doesn't bode well for platform's future]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/10/22/sony-ericsson-says-uiq-is-teh-sux-probably-doesnt-bode-well-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Completely agree. It was basically clear for a long time, given that a small manufacturer like SE hardly offered any UIQ-based phones and Motorola's Z8/Z10 failed to gain any operator support...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2008 8:39AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>