<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why in the world is AT&T eating up more companies??  And why didn't T-Mobile pick them up instead??  The latter needs the expanded coverage and increased subscribers more than the Death Star.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carcomptoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2008 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, AT&T wants to fill in more areas with "their" coverage so that AT&T subscribers don't roam as much. Also the reason why T-Mobile didn't acquire it is because it's a predominantly 850 MHz carrier and T-Mobile is almost fully 1900 MHz. So, it would be an issue for T-Mobile customers who only have PCS-only phones. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2008 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[all about the future version of Apple’s iPhone....<br><a href="http://snsays.com/1858/iphone-3g-tethering/" rel="nofollow">http://snsays.com/1858/iphone-3g-tethering/</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[surya narayan singh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2008 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T picks up Centennial Communications for $944 million]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/11/08/atandt-picks-up-centennial-communications-for-944-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm actually surprised at this move considering what AT&T is facing in 2009, and what impact it has had thus far in preparation for union talks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2008 7:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>