Sounds like a device issue rather than a network issue. Are you implying that somehow this bug could "infect", or be used to hack the network? Not trying to be snarky, but I'm curious as to how you might think that would work.
What? My comment didn't imply any possible infection of the network-- I was simply saying that maybe AT&T and Sprint were right not to commit to Android given this new issue. Both companies commented that they believe Android needs more development before they will bring it to their networks; and maybe they said that knowing that Android isn't very tested and could present a lot of issues in the future. These problems I am referring to are hand-set/device issues not network.
“The Pixi -- a sleek, tiny device -- seems clearly aimed at the only market Palm has recently enjoyed unfettered success with: the Centro demographic.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Guess AT&T and Sprint were right to say that Android needs some work before they will put it on their networks.
Sounds like a device issue rather than a network issue. Are you implying that somehow this bug could "infect", or be used to hack the network? Not trying to be snarky, but I'm curious as to how you might think that would work.
What? My comment didn't imply any possible infection of the network-- I was simply saying that maybe AT&T and Sprint were right not to commit to Android given this new issue. Both companies commented that they believe Android needs more development before they will bring it to their networks; and maybe they said that knowing that Android isn't very tested and could present a lot of issues in the future. These problems I am referring to are hand-set/device issues not network.