<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Can't wait.  Although normally assumed for T-Mobile BlackBerry's, does this thing support UMA?  The specs only say WiFi.<br><br>Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, this device does UMA.  There will be another 3G version later in the year, probably close to August, which represents an evolution of the 9000/Bold, and which will also do UMA on T-Mobile USA at that point.  That device will add the 1.7 GHz HSPA radio to the current 9000/Bold, as well as many of the improvements in the 8900:  MicroUSB instead of MiniUSB, 3.2mp camera instead of 2.0, and 480x360 screen instead of 480x320.  So in effect, that next model sort of blends the best of the 9000/Bold with the new 8900.  A similar model, with the requisite CDMA/EVDO radios, will also become available for Sprint/Verizon probably a little earlier, around May.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Wahlman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Why so far out to get a version of the 9000 series?  <br><br>If RIM can make a CDMA version of the Bold, surely they can make one capable of using the AWS band too without much difficulty, right?<br><br>I'm not complaining, just asking.  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Genius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why so far?  It's simply a matter of RIM making its first-ever 1.7 GHz radio device.  I too would like for it to be available here in 1Q09, but the fact of the matter is that it will be closer to 3Q.  Is there a chance of it being available by June?  Sure, perhaps, but don't count on it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Wahlman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[^This from the same guy who stated that Blackberry's have been on EVDO since 2003. A grain of salt is a grain of salt wasted on this 'source'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backbeat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 10:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Genius:<br><br>Why do you want a CDMA version of the Bold that's AWS-equipped?  The only major carrier that uses it is T-Mobile, which of course is GSM.  Unless you want to use this hypothetical AWS CDMA Bold on Cricket or MetroPCS, that thing would be completely pointless.<br><br>What an ironic username...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carcomptoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on T-Mobile's BlackBerry Curve 8900 seemingly pegged for February 11]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/05/t-mobiles-blackberry-curve-8900-seemingly-pegged-for-february-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[errrr forget what I said...I just reread your statement.  I'm pretty sure there will be an AWS-capable this year--after all, when it comes down to it, it's just a different frequency.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carcomptoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2009 8:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>