EDGE uses otherwise *unused* 2GSM capacity, as long as people are using GSM, EDGE will be efficient to deploy.
This article is, frankly, completely ridiculous. There is no benefit to AT&T at all to force people off of EDGE. UMTS phones are more expensive, requiring higher subsidies, and UMTS has horrible spectrum requirements. In many areas, if AT&T tried to increase the amount of spectrum it is using for UMTS, it would to shut down the 2GSM network in that area altogether.
The most likely reason for slower EDGE, if, indeed, that's happening, is more people using the network, both for voice and data. That seems fairly probable: people are finally getting used to mobile data, and they're starting to use it seriously. I wouldn't doubt at all that AT&T is getting more data traffic than ever before.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
EDGE uses otherwise *unused* 2GSM capacity, as long as people are using GSM, EDGE will be efficient to deploy.
This article is, frankly, completely ridiculous. There is no benefit to AT&T at all to force people off of EDGE. UMTS phones are more expensive, requiring higher subsidies, and UMTS has horrible spectrum requirements. In many areas, if AT&T tried to increase the amount of spectrum it is using for UMTS, it would to shut down the 2GSM network in that area altogether.
The most likely reason for slower EDGE, if, indeed, that's happening, is more people using the network, both for voice and data. That seems fairly probable: people are finally getting used to mobile data, and they're starting to use it seriously. I wouldn't doubt at all that AT&T is getting more data traffic than ever before.